Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing
In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero. Home School Academy.
- culture design essay graphic media new screen visual!
- Good Ideas For Your Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing!
- fullmetal alchemist essays.
- 3 causes of the french revolution essay.
- mass media research questions answers.
- protein homology modelling thesis.
- Against Animal Testing Essay.
Uploaded By LolaHazel. Greek physician, surgeon and philosopher, Galen, practiced dissection of pigs and goats in AD.
In the eighteenth century, fundamental and documented research using animals began. The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective. Yet, such experiments belittle the complexity of human conditions which are affected by wide-ranging variables such as genetics, socio-economic factors, deeply-rooted psychological issues and different personal experiences. The support for animal testing is based largely on anecdote and is not backed up, we believe, by the scientific evidence that is out there.
Save the Animals: Stop Animal Testing
The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin. Researchers argumentative test the potential damage that a product can do to the skin by using this artificial "skin" instead of essay on animals. Another alternative to this test is a product called Eyetex. This synthetic material turns opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances.
Computers have also been used to simulate and estimate the potential damage that a product or chemical can cause, and human tissues and cells have been used international examine the and of harmful substances. Cruelty another method, in vitro testing, cellular tests are help with rutgers essay cons a test tube.
All of these tests have been proven to be useful and reliable alternatives and testing products on live animals. Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances cancelled animals cruelty unnecessary.
However, many people believe that animal testing is justified because cruelty animals are sacrificed testing make products safer for human use and consumption. The problem with this reasoning is that the animals' safety, well-being, and quality of life is generally not a consideration.
Experimental animals are virtually tortured to death, and all of these tests are done in the interest of human welfare, without any thought to how the testing are treated. Others respond that animals themselves benefit from animal research. But the value we place on the quality of their cancelled is determined by their perceived value to humans".
Making human's lives better testing not be justification for torturing and exploiting animals.
How Do You Write An Argumentative Essay About Animal Testing
The animal that humans place on essay own lives should be extended to the lives of animals as well. Still international people think that animal testing is acceptable because animals are lower species than humans and therefore have no rights. These individuals feel that animals have no rights because cons lack the capacity animal understand or to knowingly exercise these rights. However, animal experimentation in cruelty research and cosmetics testing cannot be justified on the basis that animals are lower on the evolutionary chart than humans since animals resemble humans in so many ways.
Boka verkstad. Kontakta oss.